Crazy Joe rates the overall quality A (on a scale from F to A), meaning astounding, and the recording quality 8 (on a scale from 0 to 9), meaning astounding.
>From: alan.fraser@mcmail.com (Alan Fraser) >Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Re: Never Mind the Bollocks Here's Bob Dylan bootCD >Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 09:03:27 GMT >On Mon, 15 Dec 1997 23:12:08 GMT, sb30299@glo.be wrote: > >>Never Mind the Bollocks Here's Bob Dylan >>= Cardiff 97 show >> >>I heard the bonus tracks on this CD are in very bad sound quality. Can >>anyone confirm this? > >Yes. CD2 is going to be replaced, not seen it yet though.
>From: alan.fraser@mcmail.com (Alan Fraser) >Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Never Mind The Bollocks CD2 >Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 14:58:45 GMT >I hear from my source that the faulty 2nd CD of this set has now been >replaced and is in "excellent quality". The end of the Cardiff show >continued from CD 1 was always OK, but the filler tracks were >distorted, with the Popeshow tracks being especially so, unplayable. >They should now be OK.
>From: alan.fraser@mcmail.com (Alan Fraser) >Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Re: Love Sick At Wembley... >Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 11:18:08 GMT >The full Cardiff concert is on Never Mind The Bollocks, Here's Bob >Dylan, with Rank Strangers from Wembley, a couple of Bournemouth >tracks and the Pope Show. There are also excellent quality tapes of >all these concerts.
>From: Dino>Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Re: FS: Never Mind The Bollocks Here's Bob Dylan >Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 16:16:31 -0400 >Message-ID: <3554B99F.65E0@geocities.com> >while i cannot vouch for viktor, i can vouch for this set. it is truly >fabulous. the main show is one of the strongest i've heard, the quality >is excellent (audience is noticeable but hardly intrusive) and sounds >more full and natural than even Christiana. the filler is superb, too, >and features the wonderful Pope show in excellent quality. one of my 3 >favorite boots. >Message-ID: <3557C01E.4D9@punkhart.com> >Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 19:21:05 -0800 >From: John Howells >Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Re: FS: Never Mind The Bollocks Here's Bob Dylan >Sound quality is excellent, but I just want to put in a slight >warning. The mix is way off. You can't hear Larry Campbell at >all (was he even at this show?) and you hear Bucky Baxter close >and up front. For Bucky fans this will be a real treat, but for >Campbell fans you may be disappointed. It sure sounds weird to >hear "Rolling Stone" with lots of steel guitar dominating the >sound. >From: Martin Cowley >Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Re: FS: Never Mind The Bollocks Here's Bob Dylan >Date: 12 May 1998 21:24:01 GMT >Message-ID: <6jaelh$pn$1@news2.news.iol.ie> >This is very true - actually I like it because I was more or less under >Bob's mike for this show and as usual up front it was quite hard to hear >both Bob and Bucky, so on this CD anyway it's the other way around - well >worth checking out to see just how good Bucky Baxter is. Are Bob and >Bucky mixed differently to Larry, Garnier et al, I wonder? > >Ken. >From: Dino >Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan >Subject: Re: FS: Never Mind The Bollocks Here's Bob Dylan >Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 20:01:32 -0400 >Message-ID: <3558E2DC.127E@geocities.com> >It's because the PA is mixed in stereo now. They apparently started >doing that about 8 or 10 years ago. I think Bucky, Tony, and Bob are on >the right channel, and Larry and Dave are on the left (though i might be >switching Tony and Larry). The vocal mike is presumably equal on both >channels so it sounds like it's in the middle. the setup works fine if >you're further back and in the middle of the hall (where the sound guy >sits). but if you're close to the stage and off to one side, it's pretty >awful at times. > >personally, I'd rather hear more of Bucky on the boots. My hearing >isn't so hot, and when i'm at the shows all i can hear are the guitars, >drums, and vocals. I love the opportunity to hear the pedal steel and >bass properly.